Articles of Note:

Wallpapering with Red Tape Editiorial by George F. Will, Washington Post, March 2007 read more

Designing Cartels: How Industry Insiders Cut Out Competition The Institute for Justice, September 2006 (PDF)

Institute For Justice www.ij.org

 

INTERIOR DESIGN LEGISLATION IN
OTHER STATES:

Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
Washington DC
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

For more information please contact:

staff@interiordesignfreedom.org

 

South Carolina Practice Act To Be Considered By Committee at 2:30 pm on Janary 30 in Room 403 of the Blatt Building, Pendleton Street, Columbia SC.

The bill in South Carolina will impact designers across the region, including those at High Point NC and the Atlanta Mart.

In order to preserve designers' rights in the entire region and nation, we can't afford not to overturn this bill.

 

1. Testify at the Hearing Wednesday January 30

The more design professionals that represent opposition to design legislation next Tuesday at the State House, the better! The public hearing will take place at 2:30 pm on Janary 30 in Room 403 of the Blatt Building, Pendleton Street, Columbia SC.

 

2. Contact every member of the committee and the bill sponsors to voice your opposition

Please follow this link to send a letter or email to the members letting them know of your concern about the bill, how it will negatively impact your business, and your desire that it not be considered further.

If your representative is not on the Committee, please also send a copy of your message to the Committee members as well.  Here is a listing of the members along with their email addresses:

Labor, Commerce and Industry Committee
The Honorable Harry F. Cato, Chairman, R-Greenville HLC@schouse.org
The Honorable Thomas M. Dantzler, First Vice-Chairman, R-Berkeley-Charleston TMD@schouse.org
The Honorable Michael D. Thompson, Second Vice-Chairman, R-Anderson MT@schouse.org
Banking and Consumer Affairs Subcommittee
The Honorable Nikki R. Haley, Chairman, R-Lexington HaleyN@schouse.org
The Honorable William K. Bowers, D-Colleton-Hampton WKB@schouse.org 
The Honorable Joan B. Brady, R-Richland BradyJ@schouse.org
The Honorable Grady A. Brown, D-Lee-Sumter GB@schouse.org
The Honorable David J. Mack, III D-Charleston DJM@schouse.org

The Honorable Phillip D. Owens, R-Pickens owensp@schouse.org

 

Citizen response to legislation has worked effectively in combating design legislation in other states.

 

Information about Proposed Practice Act in SC

What is being proposed is a practice act which will absolutely prevent you from working in the State of South Carolina (unless, of course, you meet the requirements of the new law).

A person seeking to become a registered interior designer must:
(1) hold a current NCIDQ certification; or
(2) if you are performing interior design services on July 1, 2008, you may apply by June 30, 2012 (or two years following the establishment of the board) if you: (a) possess at least 10 years of combined interior design education and interior design experience, 2 years of which must be interior design education from a program accredited by the Council of Interior Design Accreditation (CIDA) or another program that the department deems substantially equivalent; and (b) pass Section One the NCIDQ examination (assuming you are permitted to even sit for the exam as NCIDQ has strict requirements as to who can and cannot take the test, including education and internship requirements).

DON'T BE FOOLED BY GRANDFATHERING. The interior designers supporting legislation have historically told our members and other designers - Don't worry, you will be grandfathered. Don't believe it! Aside from the wide discretion given to the Board to waive the education requirements, you will have to submit documented proof of diversified experience in the practice of Interior Design for ten years, that you were working as an interior designer prior to January 1, 1999 and that you passed Section One of the NCIDQ exam (see above).

Our experience from other states demonstrates that our members will not have "diversified experience in the practice of Interior Design" as defined by the members of the Board. Experienced designers in other states, some with 20+years of commercial and residential work, have been denied on the grounds that whatever work they did was not "diversified experience in the practice of Interior Design". Who defines what that is? Your competitors (who, surprisingly, all seem to have sufficient diversified experience in the practice of Interior Design as they define it).

What about exemptions? They don't help. If this bill passes, you will be "allowed" to provide decorating services or assistance in selecting surface materials, window treatments, wall coverings, paint, floor coverings, surface-mounted fixtures, or loose furnishings. If you are an employee of a retail establishment, you may provide consultation regarding interior decoration or furnishings during a retail sale or prospective retail sale. We can assure you that the services you provide on a daily basis will not be considered "decorating services" or "consultation".

In a blatant attempt to mollify the large retailers, the coalition has now added another exemption for a national retailer of home improvement products and services which employs no fewer than 150,000 people in 40 or more states. So, a kitchen designer with 24 years experience, nationally recognized for his or her expertise, with a large portfolio of satisfied customers, will be licensed out of existence, but a 17 year old with no experience or skill can design kitchens, baths, interiors, hospitals, offices etc. without the need for regulation!

Your involvement is crucial to prevent your being legislated out of existence; the South Carolina Legislature must hear from you that you oppose this needless, unwarranted infringement on your right to earn a living and that your right to continue to practice your chosen profession must be protected.

 

In the News...

NKBA (National Kitchen and Bath Association) opposes Minnesota Interior Design Practice Act read more

Read The New Unions from Forbes Magazine

Alabama Supreme Court Invalidated Interior Design Practice Act read more

Massachusetts Fire Chiefs oppose Interior Design Legislation read more

Associated General Contractors of Mass oppose Interior Design Legislation read more

Massachusetts Building Inspectors Oppose Interior Design Legislation read more

Retailers Association of Massachuestts Opposes Design Legislation
press release

testimony

Institute for Justice Senior Attorney testifies against Interior Design Legislation read more

NFIB calls Interior Design Legislation “a solution looking for a problem”. read more
NFIB website
NFIB testimony

Boston Society of Architects (BSA) opposes Massachusetts SB 178 “An Act To License Interior Designers” read more

NKBA testifies against Interior Design Legislation read more

National Kitchen & Bath Association mounts $500,000 campaign to fight Interior Design Legislation. read more

Legislation Should be a Last Resort: Kitchen & Bath Design News
read more

Governor Bill Ritter of Colorado Vetoes Interior Design Bill read more

Governor Mitch Daniels of Indiana Vetoes Interior Design Legislation read more

Governor George Pataki vetoes New York's Interior Designer Act For the Second Straight Year. read more

Extensive research shows claims in new IIDA video to be untrue

Texas Interior Designers
File Lawsuit Challenging State Censorship
read more

New Hampshire Interior Design Legislation Defeated read more

New Mexico Ends Unconstitutional Censorship of Interior Designers
read more