Articles of Note:

Wallpapering with Red Tape Editiorial by George F. Will, Washington Post, March 2007 read more

Designing Cartels: How Industry Insiders Cut Out Competition The Institute for Justice, September 2006 (PDF)

Institute For Justice www.ij.org

 

INTERIOR DESIGN LEGISLATION IN
OTHER STATES:

Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
Washington DC
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

 

For more information please contact:

staff@interiordesignfreedom.org

 

Legislation in MI

For more information: Washington Professionals Protecting Design Freedom
www.wa-ppdf.org

Click here to download the complete PDF

WA-PPDF opposes House Bill-2895 because—

Thousands of competent interior design professionals inWashington State will be put out of business, YET THE PUBLIC IS NOT IN DANGER!

No Real Danger to the Public

 The opposition says HB2895 will “safeguard public health and life safety.” In fact, its real effect is to limit the public’s access to Interior design services. It denies the public’s right to ascribe free market value to interior design services. Monopolistic control means higher costs!

 In 2005, the Washington State Department of Licensing conducted a Sunrise Review to determine if interior design licensing was needed. Their conclusion was that “the public can reasonably expect that an interior designer is a competent practitioner through certification, testing, and experience as required by professional associations.” It also states “There is no clear evidence that unregulated practice can harm or endanger the health, safety, or welfare of the citizens of the state.” Read that as: THERE IS NO DANGER!

REAL Danger to Professional Designers

 HB-2895 Sec. 2.7(a) states “’Interior Design’ means designs, consultations, studies, drawings, specifications…” including “space planning, finishes, furnishings” and more. It describes “a scope of services performed by a professional design practitioner” as one whose services include “any or all of the following tasks:
(i) Research and analysis of the client’s goals and requirements, and development of documents, drawings, and diagrams that outline those needs.
(ii) Formulation of preliminary space plans, and two- and three-dimensional design concept studies and sketches….
(iii) Confirmation that preliminary space plans and design concepts are safe, functional, aesthetically appropriate, and meet all public health, safety, and welfare requirements, including code, accessibility, environmental, and sustainability requirements.”

 Sec . 3. (1) “Only registered design professionals under this chapter may render interior design services,” as described above.

 If you are not registered, you may not provide the services described! AND, as you will see, only one pathway will qualify you to register. This deliberately disregards the many “professional associations” cited by the State of Washington’s Sunrise Review.

 Any designer found guilty by the ASID/IIDA-established board of “A violation of any provision of this chapter…shall be fined up to one thousand dollars for each offense, and each and every day of violation ……shall constitute a separate offense.” Sec. 13. WA-PPDF Washington Professionals Protecting Design Freedom

Requirements for Registration

 Pass the NCIDQ exam. Sec. 4.3. Only a few hundred interior designers in the state meet this qualification currently.

 Hold an accredited certificate, diploma, or degree in interior design. Sec. 4. The only accredited programs currently in Washington State areWSU or BCC. The bill does not address education obtained from non-accredited institutions. By 2012, only a 4-year bachelor degree from a CIDA-accredited program will qualify you for registration. Sec. 4.1. The bill sidesteps how the State will pay to bring current community college programs into compliance.)

 “Each applicant shall provide proof of a minimum of two years full-time diversified interior design experience under direct supervision of a registered interior designer or licensed architect…” Sec. 4.2. How many qualified designers will be forced into undesirable arrangements, serving under these RIDs?

What about a Grandfather clause?

“Any person who applies for registration …..within a two-year period after the effective date of this act shall be registered provided that the applicant meets subsections (1), (2) and (3) of this section:”
1) Passage of the NCIDQ exam.
2) In lieu of the requirement for an accredited degree, a program that the board* deems equivalent may be accepted.
3) In lieu of the education requirement, the board* may register applicants with proof of 15 years of diversified interior design experience.

* The interior design board will be seven persons, each serving 5-year terms, appointed by the Governor from a list of names submitted by ASID Washington State Chapter and IIDA Northern Pacific Chapter

Exemptions

1) Licensed architects, if they do not refer to themselves as being registered interior designers.

2) Employees of a retail establishment providing consultation regarding interior decoration or furnishings on the premises of the retail establishment or in furtherance of a retail sale…a person who provides decorative services or assistance in selection of surface materials, window treatments, wall coverings, paint, floor coverings, surface mounted fixtures and loose furnishings not subject to jurisdictional codes…” Sec.10.2. [Emphasis added.]

Since “jurisdictional codes” has many meanings, who knows how the new interior design board would use its power to further restrict employees! Remember: Do not draw, sketch, or provide other interior design services as described above because these activities will require you be registered.

The WA-PPDF is committed to protecting the public’s access to interior design, the careers of thousands of design professionals, and the multitudes of families of contractors and their sub-contractors affected by any interior design legislation!

Please support us in opposing this effort!
Contact Leslie Jensen: leslie@signaturewoodworks.org
or visit www.wa-ppdf.com

In the News...

NKBA (National Kitchen and Bath Association) opposes Minnesota Interior Design Practice Act read more

Read The New Unions from Forbes Magazine

Alabama Supreme Court Invalidated Interior Design Practice Act read more

Massachusetts Fire Chiefs oppose Interior Design Legislation read more

Associated General Contractors of Mass oppose Interior Design Legislation read more

Massachusetts Building Inspectors Oppose Interior Design Legislation read more

Retailers Association of Massachuestts Opposes Design Legislation
press release

testimony

Institute for Justice Senior Attorney testifies against Interior Design Legislation read more

NFIB calls Interior Design Legislation “a solution looking for a problem”. read more
NFIB website
NFIB testimony

Boston Society of Architects (BSA) opposes Massachusetts SB 178 “An Act To License Interior Designers” read more

NKBA testifies against Interior Design Legislation read more

National Kitchen & Bath Association mounts $500,000 campaign to fight Interior Design Legislation. read more

Legislation Should be a Last Resort: Kitchen & Bath Design News
read more

Governor Bill Ritter of Colorado Vetoes Interior Design Bill read more

Governor Mitch Daniels of Indiana Vetoes Interior Design Legislation read more

Governor George Pataki vetoes New York's Interior Designer Act For the Second Straight Year. read more

Extensive research shows claims in new IIDA video to be untrue

Texas Interior Designers
File Lawsuit Challenging State Censorship
read more

New Hampshire Interior Design Legislation Defeated read more

New Mexico Ends Unconstitutional Censorship of Interior Designers
read more